Moisture, gas ingress, and pressure differentials are the silent killers of high-reliability electronics. For mission-critical applications in aerospace, medical implants, and deep-sea exploration, standard conformal coatings are often insufficient. This is where the engineering of hermetic sealing interfaces PCB becomes the defining factor between system longevity and catastrophic failure.
A hermetic seal is not merely "waterproof"; it is an airtight barrier that prevents the passage of gases (like helium or water vapor) over decades. Achieving this on a Printed Circuit Board (PCB) requires a complex interplay of material science, precise thermal management, and rigorous validation.
At APTPCB (APTPCB PCB Factory), we specialize in high-reliability substrates that support these critical interfaces. This guide serves as a central hub for engineers and procurement managers. We will cover everything from the physics of leakage rates to the practicalities of manufacturing validation, ensuring your design meets the strictest industry standards.
Key Takeaways
Before diving into the technical nuances, here are the core concepts that define successful hermetic integration.
- Definition: A hermetic sealing interface on a PCB is a junction designed to maintain a specific leak rate (usually $< 1 \times 10^{-7}$ atm-cc/sec He) to protect internal circuitry from the external environment.
- Material Compatibility: The Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) between the PCB substrate (often Ceramic or Metal Core) and the sealing material (glass, metal, or braze) must be matched to prevent cracking.
- Metrics: The gold standard for measurement is the Helium Leak Rate, not just IP ratings (which apply to enclosures, not hermetic seals).
- Misconception: "Epoxy sealed" is rarely truly hermetic. True hermeticity usually requires glass-to-metal (GTMS) or ceramic-to-metal seals.
- Validation: Testing must go beyond visual inspection to include fine leak testing and hermetic sealing validation through thermal cycling.
- Application: Critical for Class 3 electronics where repair is impossible (e.g., pacemakers, satellites).
What hermetic sealing interfaces PCB really means (scope & boundaries)
Building on the key takeaways, we must first establish the engineering boundaries of what constitutes a hermetic interface in the context of PCB manufacturing.
The definition of Hermeticity
In the PCB industry, "hermetic" refers to the quality of a container or interface that is airtight. However, no material is absolutely impermeable. Therefore, hermetic sealing interfaces PCB are defined by a quantifiable leak rate that is low enough to be considered negligible for the product's intended lifespan.
For a PCB, the "interface" is the critical zone. This is typically where:
- Feedthroughs (pins or connectors) pass through the PCB substrate.
- The PCB itself acts as the barrier wall of a hermetic package.
- Lids or covers are soldered or brazed onto a metal ring on the PCB surface.
True Hermetic vs. Near-Hermetic
It is vital to distinguish between these two categories:
- True Hermetic: Uses inorganic materials like glass, ceramic, and metals. The interface is formed by fusion (melting) or chemical bonding at high temperatures. Common in Ceramic PCB designs.
- Near-Hermetic (Quasi-Hermetic): Uses organic materials like LCP (Liquid Crystal Polymer) or specialized epoxies. While they offer excellent moisture resistance, they allow finite diffusion over time.
The Role of the Substrate
Standard FR4 is porous and absorbs moisture. Therefore, a true hermetic sealing interfaces PCB design almost always utilizes non-organic substrates like Alumina ($Al_2O_3$), Aluminum Nitride ($AlN$), or specialized metal-core boards. These materials provide the density required to stop gas transmission and the thermal stability to withstand the high-temperature sealing processes (brazing or glass firing).
hermetic sealing interfaces PCB metrics that matter (how to evaluate quality)
Once the scope is defined, engineers must quantify performance using specific metrics to ensure the interface holds up under stress.
The following table outlines the critical parameters for evaluating the integrity of a hermetic seal.
| Metric | Why it matters | Typical Range / Factors | How to Measure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Helium Leak Rate | Determines the lifespan of the device by calculating gas ingress over time. | Standard: $< 1 \times 10^{-8}$ atm-cc/sec. High-Rel: $< 1 \times 10^{-9}$ atm-cc/sec. |
Helium Mass Spectrometer (Fine Leak Test). |
| CTE Mismatch | If the PCB and seal expand at different rates, the interface will crack during thermal cycling. | Target: Difference $< 2-4$ ppm/°C between materials. | TMA (Thermomechanical Analysis) of materials. |
| Shear Strength | Ensures the seal can mechanically withstand vibration and shock without delaminating. | $> 20$ MPa (depending on seal size and material). | Die Shear Tester. |
| Dielectric Withstand | Hermetic seals (especially glass) must also act as electrical insulators for feedthroughs. | $500V$ - $2000V$ DC without breakdown. | Hi-Pot Tester. |
| Moisture Vapor Transmission Rate (MVTR) | Critical for near-hermetic organic interfaces. | $< 0.01$ g/m²/day (for high-performance polymers). | Gravimetric analysis or specialized sensors. |
| Outgassing (TML/CVCM) | Materials inside the seal must not release gas that corrodes the circuit. | TML $< 1.0%$, CVCM $< 0.1%$ (NASA standards). | ASTM E595 Vacuum Stability Test. |
How to choose hermetic sealing interfaces PCB: selection guidance by scenario (trade-offs)
Understanding the metrics allows us to select the right technology; however, the "best" choice depends entirely on the operational environment and cost constraints.
Here is a comparison of how to choose the right hermetic sealing interfaces PCB approach based on specific application scenarios.
Scenario 1: Medical Implants (Pacemakers, Neurostimulators)
- Requirement: Zero failure, biocompatibility, 10+ year lifespan inside the body.
- Recommended Interface: Ceramic-to-Metal Brazing.
- Why: Alumina ceramic PCBs brazed with gold/tin alloys offer the highest hermeticity.
- Trade-off: Extremely high cost and long lead times. Requires accelerated aging and ALT for implants to validate.
Scenario 2: Aerospace Sensors (High Vibration/Altitude)
- Requirement: Withstand rapid pressure changes and extreme vibration.
- Recommended Interface: Glass-to-Metal Seals (GTMS) on Metal Core PCBs.
- Why: Compression seals (where the metal housing shrinks onto the glass) are incredibly robust against mechanical shock.
- Trade-off: Limited electrical frequency performance due to the dielectric constant of sealing glass.
Scenario 3: Deep Sea Electronics (High Pressure)
- Requirement: Resist massive external pressure (hundreds of bars).
- Recommended Interface: Thick Film Ceramic with Sintered Vias.
- Why: A solid ceramic block with conductive vias fired into the structure eliminates the "interface" gap entirely.
- Trade-off: Size limitations; ceramic panels are typically smaller than standard FR4 panels.
Scenario 4: High-Frequency Radar (5G/6G/Defense)
- Requirement: Hermeticity with low signal loss.
- Recommended Interface: Co-fired Ceramic (HTCC/LTCC).
- Why: Allows for complex 3D structures and impedance-controlled feedthroughs that standard glass seals cannot match.
- Trade-off: High NRE (Non-Recurring Engineering) costs for tooling.
Scenario 5: Industrial Sensors (Cost-Sensitive)
- Requirement: Protection from oil/dust, moderate cost.
- Recommended Interface: Epoxy Potting / Conformal Coating.
- Why: While not "true hermetic" (gas still penetrates slowly), it is sufficient for liquid protection.
- Trade-off: Not suitable for vacuum environments or long-term gas exclusion.
Scenario 6: High-Temperature Automotive (Engine Control)
- Requirement: Operation at $>150°C$.
- Recommended Interface: Heavy Copper on Ceramic.
- Why: Standard solder melts or fatigues; brazed interfaces or high-temp alloys are required.
- Trade-off: Assembly requires specialized reflow profiles.
hermetic sealing interfaces PCB implementation checkpoints (design to manufacturing)

After selecting the right approach, the focus shifts to execution. The transition from design to manufacturing is where most hermetic failures occur.
Use this checklist to guide your project through the PCB fabrication process and assembly.
Material Selection Review:
- Action: Verify CTE data for the PCB substrate, the housing (e.g., Kovar, Titanium), and the sealing medium (Glass/Braze).
- Risk: Mismatch leads to immediate cracking during cool-down.
- Acceptance: Simulation report showing stress levels below material limits.
Pad Design for Sealing:
- Action: Design pads with appropriate "wetting" areas for brazing or soldering. Avoid sharp corners which concentrate stress.
- Risk: Poor meniscus formation leads to leak paths.
- Acceptance: IPC-610 Class 3 solder fillet criteria.
Surface Finish Compatibility:
- Action: Choose finishes compatible with the sealing method (e.g., Electroless Nickel Boron or Thick Gold). Avoid HASL for hermetic seals.
- Risk: Oxidation or intermetallic embrittlement.
- Acceptance: XRF measurement of plating thickness.
Pre-Seal Cleaning:
- Action: Implement plasma cleaning or solvent washes to remove all organic residues.
- Risk: Carbonization of residues during high-temp sealing creates leak paths.
- Acceptance: Dyne pen test or water break test.
Baking (Outgassing):
- Action: Bake PCBs to remove trapped moisture before sealing.
- Risk: Moisture turns to steam during sealing, blowing holes in the seal (popcorning).
- Acceptance: Weight loss verification.
Sealing Profile Optimization:
- Action: Develop a thermal profile that minimizes time at peak temperature.
- Risk: Thermal shock to the ceramic or glass.
- Acceptance: Cross-section analysis of the interface.
Visual Inspection (Pre-Test):
- Action: Inspect for micro-cracks, voids, or dewetting using magnification.
- Risk: Wasting time on leak testing obviously defective parts.
- Acceptance: No visible cracks at 10x-40x magnification.
Gross Leak Testing:
- Action: Bubble test (fluorocarbon) to catch large holes.
- Risk: Saturating the fine leak detector if a large leak exists.
- Acceptance: No bubbles observed.
Fine Leak Testing:
- Action: Helium mass spectrometry.
- Risk: False passes due to "virtual leaks" (helium trapped in surface crevices, not inside the package).
- Acceptance: Leak rate below specified limit (e.g., $10^{-8}$).
Environmental Stress Screening (ESS):
- Action: Thermal cycling post-seal.
- Risk: Latent defects that only open up after thermal expansion.
- Acceptance: Pass leak test after cycling.
hermetic sealing interfaces PCB common mistakes (and the correct approach)
Even with a checklist, specific errors plague hermetic sealing interfaces PCB projects. Identifying these early saves significant capital.
Mistake 1: Relying on Solder Mask for Sealing.
- Reality: Solder mask is a polymer. It absorbs moisture. It is never a hermetic barrier.
- Correction: The seal must be Metal-to-Metal or Glass-to-Metal. The mask should be retracted from the sealing area.
Mistake 2: Ignoring "Virtual Leaks".
- Reality: Trapped gas in blind vias or under components can release slowly during testing, mimicking a seal failure.
- Correction: Design vents or ensure thorough vacuum baking. Use solid filled vias where possible.
Mistake 3: Mismatched CTE in the Z-Axis.
- Reality: Engineers often match X/Y expansion but forget that PCBs expand significantly more in the Z-axis (thickness).
- Correction: Use materials with isotropic CTE properties or design compliant interconnects (like fuzz buttons or wire bonds) rather than rigid pins.
Mistake 4: Confusing "Waterproof" with "Hermetic".
- Reality: IP68 means water doesn't enter under pressure for a short time. Hermetic means helium doesn't enter for 20 years.
- Correction: Define the requirement based on gas diffusion, not just liquid ingress.
Mistake 5: Inadequate Validation for Implants.
- Reality: Standard industrial tests are insufficient for the human body.
- Correction: Implement accelerated aging and ALT for implants (Arrhenius equation based testing) to simulate years of degradation in weeks.
Mistake 6: Over-specifying the Leak Rate.
- Reality: Demanding $10^{-11}$ when $10^{-8}$ is sufficient drives up cost exponentially.
- Correction: Calculate the actual allowable moisture content for the device's life and spec accordingly.
hermetic sealing interfaces PCB FAQ (cost, lead time, materials, testing, acceptance criteria)
Addressing the most frequent questions regarding the procurement and engineering of hermetic PCBs.
Q1: How does requiring a hermetic sealing interface affect PCB cost? A: It significantly increases cost. Moving from a standard FR4 board to a Ceramic or Metal-Core board with hermetic plating can increase the unit price by 5x to 20x, depending on volume. The testing labor (100% leak test) also adds to the cost.
Q2: What is the typical lead time for custom hermetic PCBs? A: Unlike standard Quick Turn PCB services which take days, hermetic solutions often require 4-8 weeks. This accounts for tooling (brazing fixtures), material procurement (ceramics), and specialized validation steps.
Q3: What are the best materials for hermetic sealing validation in medical devices? A: Titanium housings welded to Alumina ($Al_2O_3$) ceramic feedthroughs are the standard. For the PCB itself, LTCC (Low Temperature Co-fired Ceramic) is often used. Validation requires accelerated aging and ALT for implants to prove the interface won't degrade in saline environments.
Q4: Can I use standard FR4 for a hermetic application? A: Generally, no. The epoxy resin in FR4 outgasses and absorbs moisture. However, you can mount a hermetic connector onto an FR4 board, provided the hermetic barrier is at the connector interface, not the board itself.
Q5: What are the acceptance criteria for a "Fine Leak"? A: The most common standard is MIL-STD-883, Method 1014. For a cavity volume less than 0.01 cc, the rejection limit is typically $5 \times 10^{-8}$ atm-cc/sec. For larger volumes, the limit may be relaxed to $1 \times 10^{-7}$.
Q6: How do you test for hermeticity without helium? A: Optical Leak Testing (using laser interferometry to measure lid deflection) and Krypton-85 radioisotope testing are alternatives, but Helium Mass Spectrometry remains the industry standard for sensitivity and safety.
Q7: Does gold plating improve the hermetic seal? A: Soft gold is excellent for wire bonding, but for brazing or soldering a seal, the gold must be controlled. Too much gold causes "gold embrittlement" in tin-lead or SAC solders. Often, a nickel barrier layer is more critical for the seal integrity.
Q8: What is the difference between a compression seal and a matched seal? A: A matched seal uses materials with identical CTEs (chemical bond). A compression seal uses a housing with a higher CTE than the glass; as it cools, it shrinks onto the glass, creating a physical seal. Compression seals are generally more robust mechanically.
Resources for hermetic sealing interfaces PCB (related pages and tools)
To further your understanding of the underlying technologies at APTPCB, explore these related capabilities:
- Ceramic PCB Manufacturing: The foundation for most true hermetic designs.
- Medical PCB Solutions: Specifics on biocompatibility and high-reliability standards.
- Aerospace & Defense PCB: Where hermeticity meets extreme vibration and temperature requirements.
- PCB Quality Control: Details on our testing protocols, including IPC standards.
hermetic sealing interfaces PCB glossary (key terms)
A quick reference guide to the terminology used in hermetic engineering.
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Hermeticity | The state of being airtight or gas-tight. |
| Leak Rate | The rate at which a gas (usually Helium) passes through a barrier, measured in atm-cc/sec. |
| CTE (Coefficient of Thermal Expansion) | How much a material expands per degree of temperature change (ppm/°C). Crucial for seal integrity. |
| Getter | A material placed inside a hermetic package to absorb stray gases or moisture over time. |
| Feedthrough | A conductor that passes through a hermetic wall (e.g., glass-to-metal seal) to connect internal and external circuits. |
| GTMS | Glass-to-Metal Seal. A common method for creating hermetic feedthroughs. |
| Kovar | An iron-nickel-cobalt alloy designed to have a CTE matching that of hard glass, used extensively in hermetic seals. |
| Frit | A mixture of glass powder and binders used to bond ceramic to metal or ceramic to ceramic. |
| Brazing | A metal-joining process using a filler metal (braze) that melts above 450°C. Stronger than soldering. |
| Outgassing | The release of gas that was dissolved, trapped, or absorbed in a material. |
| Virtual Leak | A pocket of gas trapped outside the hermetic seal (e.g., under a screw) that releases slowly, mimicking a true leak. |
| ALT (Accelerated Life Testing) | Testing a product at elevated stress levels (temp/humidity) to predict service life in a shorter time. |
| Helium Mass Spectrometer | An instrument used to detect and measure very small leaks by sensing helium gas. |
Conclusion (next steps)
Achieving a reliable hermetic sealing interfaces PCB is one of the most challenging aspects of electronics packaging. It requires moving beyond standard FR4 thinking and embracing the physics of ceramics, metals, and glass. Whether you are designing a cochlear implant or a deep-sea sensor, the interface is the first line of defense.
At APTPCB, we have the materials, the brazing capabilities, and the validation equipment to ensure your design remains gas-tight for its entire lifecycle.
Ready to move forward? When requesting a quote or DFM review for a hermetic project, please provide:
- Gerber Files: Including specific layers for sealing rings or brazing pads.
- Stackup & Material Specs: Specify the ceramic type (Alumina/AlN) or metal core requirements.
- Leak Rate Requirement: (e.g., $< 1 \times 10^{-8}$ atm-cc/sec).
- Environmental Conditions: Operating temperature range and pressure.
- Validation Needs: Do you require 100% fine leak testing or specific hermetic sealing validation protocols?
Contact our engineering team today to secure your critical electronics against the elements.