Flexible Printed Circuits (FPCs) offer unmatched versatility, but they introduce a complex challenge: material instability. Unlike rigid FR4, Polyimide (PI) is a dynamic material that changes size during processing. Mastering PI shrinkage and dimensional control is the difference between a functional circuit and a costly scrap pile.
At APTPCB (APTPCB PCB Factory), we understand that precision is not accidental. It requires a deep understanding of material science and process engineering. This guide covers everything from the basic definition of shrinkage to the advanced metrics used to control it.
Key Takeaways
- PI shrinkage and dimensional control is the management of Polyimide material deformation caused by heat, moisture, and mechanical stress.
- Polyimide is hygroscopic; moisture absorption is the primary driver of dimensional instability before and after lamination.
- Material grain direction (Machine Direction vs. Transverse Direction) dictates how the film shrinks; they do not shrink equally.
- Compensation scaling factors must be applied to Gerber data before manufacturing begins.
- Proper baking cycles are non-negotiable for stabilizing the material prior to assembly.
- Validation: Always use optical coordinate measuring machines (CMM) to verify registration accuracy.
- Misconception: Many designers believe "adhesiveless" PI means "zero shrinkage." It reduces it, but does not eliminate it.
What material instability. Unlike rigid FR4, Polyimide (PI) shrinkage means (scope & boundaries)
Before managing the output, we must understand the material behavior that necessitates strict control.
PI shrinkage and dimensional control refers to the engineering processes used to predict, compensate for, and verify the physical dimensions of a flexible circuit throughout fabrication. Polyimide films are inherently unstable compared to rigid glass-reinforced epoxy.
Why PI shrinks
Polyimide films are manufactured in rolls. This process creates internal stress. When the material is subjected to the high heat of lamination or the chemical attacks of etching, these stresses are released. The material attempts to return to a relaxed state, resulting in shrinkage.
The Scope of Control
Control is not limited to the raw material. It encompasses three distinct phases:
- Pre-production: Predicting the shrinkage rate based on the specific stackup and copper density.
- In-process: Controlling temperature, humidity, and handling tension to prevent mechanical distortion.
- Post-production: Ensuring the final part fits the enclosure and aligns with the connector selection for FPC.
If dimensional control fails, the solder pads will not align with the stencil. This leads to solder bridging or open circuits during assembly.
Metrics that matter (how to evaluate quality)
Once the scope is defined, we need specific numbers to track performance and ensure the material meets specifications.
The following table outlines the critical metrics APTPCB uses to evaluate dimensional stability.
| Metric | Why it matters | Typical range or influencing factors | How to measure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensional Stability | Indicates how much the material moves after etching and heating. | Method B: -0.05% to -0.15% (Adhesiveless) Method C: -0.10% to -0.25% (Adhesive-based) |
IPC-TM-650 2.2.4 (Optical measurement before/after stress). |
| Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) | Determines how much the material expands under heat (e.g., reflow). | PI Film: 20–40 ppm/°C Copper: 17 ppm/°C Mismatch causes warping. |
TMA (Thermomechanical Analysis). |
| Moisture Absorption | High moisture leads to "popcorning" and significant dimensional changes. | PI: 1.0% to 3.0% by weight. LCP: <0.04% (Better stability). |
IPC-TM-650 2.6.2.1 (Weight gain after humidity exposure). |
| Registration Accuracy | Measures the alignment between layers (e.g., Coverlay to Copper). | Standard: ±50µm Advanced: ±25µm Depends on panel size. |
X-Ray alignment systems or Optical CMM. |
| Peel Strength | While mechanical, low peel strength can indicate material degradation affecting stability. | Standard: >0.8 N/mm Decreases after multiple thermal cycles. |
IPC-TM-650 2.4.9. |
How to manage shrinkage (options and trade-offs)
Understanding these metrics allows engineers to choose the right strategy for specific applications, as different designs react differently to shrinkage.
Scenario 1: High-Density Interconnect (HDI) Flex
- Challenge: Extremely small pads (0.15mm pitch) leave no room for shrinkage error.
- Recommendation: Use Adhesiveless PI. It has better dimensional stability than adhesive-based laminates.
- Trade-off: Higher material cost, but essential for yield.
Scenario 2: Multi-layer Rigid-Flex
- Challenge: Mismatch between rigid FR4 and flexible PI causes registration issues during lamination.
- Recommendation: Use "Low-Flow" prepreg and pre-bake PI layers extensively. Apply non-linear scaling factors.
- Trade-off: Longer production time due to extended baking cycles.
Scenario 3: High-Temperature Automotive Sensors
- Challenge: Operating environments above 150°C cause continuous expansion/contraction.
- Recommendation: Select PI with a CTE closely matched to copper. Consider Liquid Crystal Polymer (LCP) if PI stability is insufficient.
- Trade-off: LCP is harder to process and laminate than PI.
Scenario 4: Dynamic Hinge Applications
- Challenge: The flex must bend millions of times.
- Recommendation: Prioritize grain direction. Align conductors parallel to the grain (Machine Direction) to maximize life, even if it complicates dimensional control.
- Trade-off: Layout restrictions. You cannot nest parts efficiently on the panel.
Scenario 5: Large Format FPC (Long Strips)
- Challenge: Shrinkage accumulates over distance. A 0.1% shrink on a 500mm strip is 0.5mm—enough to miss a connector.
- Recommendation: Use "Step-and-Repeat" scaling. Break the design into zones and align locally rather than globally.
- Trade-off: Requires complex tooling and optical alignment systems.
Scenario 6: Impedance Controlled Flex
- Challenge: Shrinkage changes the dielectric thickness, altering impedance.
- Recommendation: Use cross-hatched ground planes instead of solid copper to reduce mechanical stress and shrinkage.
- Trade-off: Slightly higher resistance in the return path.
Implementation checkpoints (design to manufacturing)

Selecting the right approach is only the first step; execution requires a rigorous checkpoint system to maintain PI shrinkage and dimensional control.
APTPCB employs the following workflow to ensure precision.
1. Material Preparation & Baking
- Recommendation: Bake raw PI laminates at 150°C for 2-4 hours before any processing.
- Risk: Unbaked material releases moisture during lamination, causing delamination and unpredictable shrinkage.
- Acceptance: Weight loss verification (moisture removal).
2. Grain Direction Assignment
- Recommendation: Identify Machine Direction (MD) and Transverse Direction (TD). MD typically shrinks more but is stronger.
- Risk: Mixing grain directions on the same panel results in oval pads and warped circuits.
- Acceptance: Visual check of roll labels and panel layout.
3. Artwork Scaling (Compensation)
- Recommendation: Apply scaling factors to the Gerber data. Typical values: X-axis (0.05%), Y-axis (0.12%).
- Risk: Using 1:1 data will result in parts that are too small after processing.
- Acceptance: Compare CAM data dimensions against the calculated compensation table.
4. Inner Layer Etching
- Recommendation: Maintain uniform copper density. Use copper thieving (dummy copper) in empty areas.
- Risk: Uneven copper density causes the film to twist or shrink unevenly.
- Acceptance: Automated Optical Inspection (AOI) of etched features.
5. Automated Optical Punching
- Recommendation: Use optical targets (fiducials) etched into the copper to align the coverlay punching tools.
- Risk: Using mechanical edge alignment is inaccurate for flex materials.
- Acceptance: Target recognition score >90%.
6. Coverlay Lamination
- Recommendation: Use "tack-bonding" fixtures to hold the coverlay in place before the press cycle.
- Risk: The coverlay "swims" or shifts during the high-pressure phase of lamination.
- Acceptance: X-ray verification of layer-to-layer registration.
7. Surface Finish Application
- Recommendation: Use fixtures that apply tension to keep the flex flat during plating (ENIG/Immersion Gold).
- Risk: Chemical baths can cause the material to swell if not properly supported.
- Acceptance: Visual inspection for flatness.
8. Component Placement on Flex Zones
- Recommendation: If placing components, ensure stiffeners are applied before assembly to stabilize the dimension.
- Risk: The flex deforms during reflow, causing tombstoning.
- Acceptance: Solder paste inspection (SPI).
9. Profiling (Laser or Die Cut)
- Recommendation: Use Laser Direct Imaging (LDI) or laser cutting for high-tolerance outlines.
- Risk: Steel rule dies have lower tolerance (±0.2mm) compared to lasers (±0.05mm).
- Acceptance: Final dimensional check using CMM.
10. Final Quality Audit
- Recommendation: Measure the distance between critical connector pads.
- Risk: Connector pitch mismatch prevents assembly.
- Acceptance: Pass/Fail based on IPC Class 2 or 3 tolerances.
For more details on our production capabilities, visit our PCB manufacturing page.
Common mistakes (and the correct approach)
Even with a solid plan, specific oversight errors can derail the entire production run regarding PI shrinkage and dimensional control.
1. Ignoring Humidity Control in Storage
- Mistake: Storing PI films in an uncontrolled warehouse.
- Correction: Store in temperature and humidity-controlled cabinets (<50% RH). PI acts like a sponge.
2. Uniform Scaling Factors
- Mistake: Applying the same scaling factor (e.g., 0.1%) to both X and Y axes.
- Correction: Measure MD and TD shrinkage separately. They are rarely identical.
3. Poor Connector Selection for FPC
- Mistake: Choosing Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) connectors with very fine pitch (0.3mm) for long flex cables without stiffeners.
- Correction: Use stiffeners at the contact area to lock the dimensions. Ensure the connector selection for FPC matches the manufacturer's tolerance capabilities.
4. Lack of Copper Balance
- Mistake: Designing a flex with a solid ground plane on one side and sparse traces on the other.
- Correction: Hatch the ground plane. Unbalanced copper creates a "bimetallic strip" effect, causing severe curling and shrinkage.
5. Skipping the Post-Bake
- Mistake: Shipping parts immediately after profiling.
- Correction: Perform a final bake to relieve stress induced by the cutting process.
6. Over-reliance on Software Defaults
- Mistake: Trusting the CAD software's default stackup values.
- Correction: Consult the DFM guidelines provided by APTPCB to get accurate material thickness and shrinkage data.
FAQ
To address lingering uncertainties, here are answers to the most frequent technical inquiries.
Q: How much does Polyimide typically shrink? A: It varies by brand and type, but generally, adhesiveless PI shrinks 0.05% to 0.15%, while adhesive-based PI shrinks 0.15% to 0.30%.
Q: Can I reverse shrinkage if it happens? A: No. Once the polymer chains relax and the material shrinks, it is permanent. This is why pre-compensation (scaling) is critical.
Q: Does copper thickness affect shrinkage? A: Yes. Thicker copper (e.g., 2oz) restricts the movement of the PI film, resulting in less shrinkage than thinner copper (e.g., 1/3oz).
Q: What is the "Window Effect" in coverlay? A: Large openings in the coverlay can cause the exposed PI to shrink differently than the covered areas, creating localized distortion.
Q: How does APTPCB handle scaling factors? A: We run test coupons on every new batch of material to calculate the exact scaling factor before processing your production lot.
Q: Is LCP better than PI for dimensional control? A: Yes, Liquid Crystal Polymer (LCP) has much lower moisture absorption and better dimensional stability, but it is significantly more expensive.
Q: How does component placement on flex zones affect stability? A: The weight and solder alloy of components can cause sagging or warping during reflow. Stiffeners are required to maintain flatness.
Q: Why do my ZIF connector fingers not align? A: This is usually due to accumulated tolerance over the width of the cable. For wide cables, split the stiffener or use a connector with a larger pitch.
Related pages & tools
For further exploration of our capabilities and to assist your design process, utilize these specific resources:
- Impedance Calculator: Verify how material thickness changes might affect your signal integrity.
- Materials Library: Explore different PI and adhesive options.
- Gerber Viewer: Check your design files before submission.
Glossary (key terms)
Precise communication relies on a shared vocabulary of technical terms.
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Adhesiveless PI | Polyimide film with copper bonded directly without an acrylic or epoxy adhesive layer. More stable. |
| Anisotropy | The property of having different physical properties in different directions (e.g., shrinking differently in X vs Y). |
| Coverlay | The insulating layer (PI + Adhesive) laminated over the copper traces. |
| CTE | Coefficient of Thermal Expansion. The rate at which a material expands when heated. |
| Fiducial | An optical target etched into the copper used by machines for alignment. |
| Hygroscopic | The ability of a material to absorb moisture from the air. PI is highly hygroscopic. |
| Machine Direction (MD) | The direction in which the PI film was rolled during manufacturing. |
| Transverse Direction (TD) | The direction perpendicular to the roll (width-wise). |
| Scaling Factor | The percentage by which the design data is enlarged to compensate for expected shrinkage. |
| Stiffener | A rigid piece of FR4 or PI added to the flex circuit to support components or connectors. |
| Thieving | Non-functional copper dots or grids added to empty areas to balance plating and stress. |
| ZIF Connector | Zero Insertion Force connector. Requires high dimensional precision for the flex cable end. |
Conclusion (next steps)
Mastering these variables ensures your final product meets the rigorous demands of modern electronics. PI shrinkage and dimensional control is not a guessing game; it is a calculated engineering process that APTPCB has refined over years of manufacturing.
By understanding the metrics, selecting the right materials, and adhering to strict implementation checkpoints, you can eliminate assembly failures and ensure long-term reliability.
Ready to move to production? When submitting your data for a quote, please provide:
- Gerber Files: With clear outline layers.
- Stackup: Specifying adhesive vs. adhesiveless requirements.
- Tolerances: Explicitly state critical dimensions (e.g., ZIF fingers).
- Stiffener Drawings: Location and material type.
Contact us today to request a quote and let our engineers optimize your flexible circuit design for manufacturing success.